USPTO serial 75844424
ARTMACHINE.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ARTMACHINE.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott A. Morgan
SCOTT A MORGAN THOITS, LOVE, HERSHBERGER & MCLEAN245 LYTTON AVE STE 300PALO ALTO, CA 94301-1426UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Electronic publishing, namely, enabling electronic transmission of graphic arts electronic files, storing graphic arts electronic files where access is allowed to the client via a private and secure electronic environment, and processing graphic arts electronic files into additional electronic formats for use in different media via a global computer network, telephone, e-mail, and personal contacts | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer graphic art design; graphic art production services that involve the creation and preparation of graphic arts electronic files to be used for print materials, global computer network sites, and multimedia projects; technical support services involving troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems relating to computer graphic arts design and graphic art productions | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 19, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 27, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 14, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 25, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 19, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 29, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 29, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 4, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 8, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |