Drawing for VIRTUAL PILOT

USPTO serial 75844813

VIRTUAL PILOT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMPSON, LAVERNE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIRTUAL PILOT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James J. Murphy

JAMES J MURPHY WINSTEAD SECHREST & MINICK PC5400 RENAISSANCE TWR120 I ELM STDALLAS, TX 75270

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009WEB BROWSER COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN REMOTELY SUPPORTING MONITORING STATION COMPONENTS OF SEMICONDUCTOR AND MICROELECTRONICS MANUFACTURING PROCESSES OVER A GLOBAL OR LOCAL COMPUTER NETWORKACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 31, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 31, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 5, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 6, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 6, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 3, 2002RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Aug 27, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 29, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 29, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 17, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 27, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 15, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 30, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 10, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 17, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 1, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 21, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 6, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance