USPTO serial 75844813
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James J. Murphy
JAMES J MURPHY WINSTEAD SECHREST & MINICK PC5400 RENAISSANCE TWR120 I ELM STDALLAS, TX 75270| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | WEB BROWSER COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN REMOTELY SUPPORTING MONITORING STATION COMPONENTS OF SEMICONDUCTOR AND MICROELECTRONICS MANUFACTURING PROCESSES OVER A GLOBAL OR LOCAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 31, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 5, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 6, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 18, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 17, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |