Drawing for GEMFARE

USPTO serial 75847750

GEMFARE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BECK, LORETTA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with GEMFARE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen M. Knauer

STEPHEN M KNAUER GEMPLUS3 LAGOON DRREDWOOD CITY, CA 94065UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND COMPUTER HARDWARE FOR MANAGING TICKET-ISSUING APPLICATION, REMOTE TOLL COLLECTION OR AUTOMATIC TELLER MACHINES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR THE ISSUANCE, PERSONALIZATION, RECHARGING, CONTROL, VALIDATION AND MANAGEMENT OF TICKETS FROM A FULL RANGE OF TICKET-ISSUING SYSTEMS; POST-CONSUMPTION TRANSACTIONS PROCESSING SOFTWARE AND CORRESPONDING SECURITY SOFTWARE FOR TICKET-ISSUANCE, REMOTE TOLL COLLECTION AND AUTOMATIC TELLER MACHINES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND COMPUTER HARDWARE FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF PASSENGER INFORMATION ON THE TRANSPORTATION NETWORKS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND COMPUTER HARDWARE FOR CHECKING AND MANAGING THE POSITIONING OF TRANSPORTATION VEHICLE FLEETS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND COMPUTER HARDWARE FOR SPECIFYING AND MANAGING THE OFFERINGS OF PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND COMPUTER HARDWARE FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT, CONTROL AND MANAGEMENT OF USE OF TIME BY TRANSPORTATION VEHICLE DRIVERS AND OPERATORS OF TRANSPORTATION SERVICES; AND USER MANUALS SOLD AS A UNIT THEREWITHABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 3, 2003ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jun 3, 2003OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jun 3, 2003OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jan 31, 2003OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 31, 2002OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Sep 16, 2002OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Aug 29, 2002TCASTEAS CORR ADDRESS REQUEST RECEIVED BUT NOT PROCESSED STAT IS TTAB—
Aug 7, 2002OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Aug 7, 2002OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 2, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 12, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 26, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 20021.BDSec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED—
Dec 27, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 29, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 12, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 16, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 12, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 9, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance