USPTO serial 75850248
PAPERLESS INK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOLDEN, JAMES B
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PAPERLESS INK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mountain View, CA
Mountain View, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SECURITY MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE, NAMELY, SOFTWARE USED FOR MONITORING COMPUTER NETWORK SECURITY, FOR THE FACILITATION OF SECURE ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS OVER COMPUTER NETWORKS, FOR ENCRYPTION OF DATA TRANSMITTED OVER COMPUTER NETWORKS, FOR APPLYING AND VERIFYING COMPUTER USER AND ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES AND IDENTITIES, FOR PROVIDING A PUBLIC KEY DIRECTORY THAT IS USED IN VERIFYING COMPUTER USER AND ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES AND IDENTITIES, FOR REMOTE ACCESS TO COMPUTER NETWORKS, FOR DESIGNING, PRINTING, AND ACCESSING ELECTRONIC FINANCIAL FORMS, FOR WORD-PROCESSING, FOR DATA ENTRY, FOR USE AS A SPREADSHEET; COMPUTER E-COMMERCE SOFTWARE TO ALLOW USERS TO PERFORM ELECTRONIC BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR ACCESSING DATABASES IN ORDER TO ENCRYPT SECURE DATA COMMUNICATIONS; AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN DEVELOPING AND DEPLOYING SOFTWARE AGENT APPLICATIONS THAT INTERACT WITH USERS ON A COMPUTER NETWORK SERVER | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 1, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 22, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 23, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 3, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 6, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2003 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Mar 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 3, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 22, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 25, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |