USPTO serial 75853245
NOBIL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOLDEN, JAMES B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NOBIL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Chatswood, New South Wales 2067, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey H. Epstein
JEFFREY H EPSTEIN COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN, PC1133 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-6799UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN FACILITATING THE PROCESSING OF FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS AND IN READING MAGNETIC STRIPS AND MICROCHIPS ON CREDIT CARDS, DEBIT CARDS AND SMART CARDS;COMPUTER ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, COMPUTER KEYBOARDS,COMPUTER KEYPADS, VISUAL DISPLAY UNITS, NAMELY, LCD SCREENS,COMPUTER MONITORS, BAR CODE SCANNERS, COMPUTER TERMINAL SAND PRINTERS; ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, MAGNETIC STRIP AND SMART CARD READERS ADAPTED TO READ CREDIT CARDS, DEBIT CARDS AND SMART CARDS; ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT, NAMELY,COMPUTER HARDWARE ADAPTED TO FACILITATE THE TRANSMISSION OF DATA, INFORMATION AND SECURITY DETAILS, FOR USE IN FACILITATING AND PROCESSING FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS, POINT OF SALE TERMINALS, AUTOMATIC TELLER MACHINES, AND PAYMENT SYSTEMS VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; CARDS WHICH CONTAIN A MAGNETIC STRIP OR A MICROCHIP, NAMELY, CREDIT CARDS, DEBIT CARDS AND SMART CARDS ENCODED TO FACILITATE THE TRANSMISSION OF DATA, INFORMATION AND SECURITY DETAILS | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | FINANCIAL SERVICES, NAMELY, SERVICES FOR FACILITATING AND PROCESSING ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS, FUND TRANSFERS, AND ELECTRONIC PROCESSING AND TRANSMISSION OF BILL PAYMENT DATA SECURELY VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; BANK SERVICES CONDUCTED VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; DEBIT AND CREDIT CARD SERVICES CONDUCTED VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF DATA IN THE NATURE OF FINANCIAL AND SECURITY INFORMATION; PROVIDING MULTIPLE-USER ACCESS TO A RESTRICTED COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK; PROVIDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONNECTIONS TO A RESTRICTED COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 27, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 3, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |