USPTO serial 75854880
INTERSCOPE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PIGNATELLO, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INTERSCOPE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jason I. Hewitt
JASON I HEWITT BOX TMSUMORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP1111 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | INSTALLATION, SUPPORT, AND MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT AND APPARATUS USED FOR THE MANIPULATION, CAPTURE AND RETRIEVAL OF PATHOLOGY INFORMATION AND MATERIALS USED IN CONNECTION WITH COMPUTERS AND THE INTERNET | ACTIVE | Mar 15, 2004 |
| 042 | INSTALLATION, SUPPORT, MAINTENANCE AND DESIGN OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND DESIGN OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT AND APPARATUS, ALL USED FOR THE MANIPULATION, CAPTURE AND RETRIEVAL OF PATHOLOGY INFORMATION AND MATERIALS USED IN CONNECTION WITH COMPUTERS AND THE INTERNET | ACTIVE | Mar 15, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by InterScope Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by InterScope Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named INTERSCOPE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 9, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 12, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 22, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 31, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 6, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 6, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 3, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 19, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 31, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 18, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 28, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 19, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |