USPTO serial 75859234
COLIBRI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPILS, CAROL A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COLIBRI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TIMOTHY J MAHTIS
TIMOTHY J MARTIN TIMOTHY J. MARTIN, PC9250 W 5TH AVE STE 200LAKEWOOD, CO 80226UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Water pumps; shepherd's hooks; water garden kits consisting of filters, circulating pumps, and plastic liners | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | Gardening tools, namely, shovels, rakes, trowels, garden forks, dandelion diggers, pruners, shears, and pruning saws | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | gardening apparel, namely, garden clogs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Perky-Pet Products Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Perky-Pet Products Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named COLIBRI
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 10, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 21, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 6, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 20, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 24, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 23, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 2, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 29, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 29, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 12, 2002 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 10, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 16, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 30, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |