Drawing for WORK READINESS PROFILE

USPTO serial 75869798

WORK READINESS PROFILE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WORK READINESS PROFILE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sherri L. Rohlf

SHERRI L ROHLF SIEGEL BRILL GRUEPNER DUFFY & FOSTER1300 WASHINGTON SQ100 WASHINGTON AVE SMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Printed instructional materials, including envelopes to hold such information, featuring information on temporary employers used to prepare prospective candidates for employmentACTIVEMar 1, 1996

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 10, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 20, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 20, 2002EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Sep 18, 2002CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jul 23, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 22, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 22, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 26, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 12, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 22, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 25, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 15, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 5, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance