USPTO serial 75872321
X-VISION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LINCOSKI JR, JOHN T
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with X-VISION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arthur A. Gardner
ARTHUR A GARDNER GARDNER GROFF MEHRMAN & JOSEPHIC, PCPAPER MILL VILLAGE, BLDG 23600 VILLAGE TRACE, STE 300MARIETTA, GA 30067Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Aircraft display units, namely, flat panel liquid crystal displays | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 6, 2002 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 6, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 6, 2002 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 24, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 17, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 28, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 15, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 20, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |