USPTO serial 75874281
PARTSCART
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EULIN, INGRID C
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PARTSCART?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Jacksonville, FL
Jacksonville, FL
JACKSONVILLE, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard S. Vermut
RICHARD S VERMUT ROGERS TOWERS BAILEY JONES & GAY PA1301 RIVERPLACE BLVDSTE 1500JACKSONVILLE, FL 32207Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Developing promotional campaigns for businesses which offer after market and original equipment manufacturer (OEM) equipment used by supermarkets, convenience stores and retail outlets; electronic retailing services via computer featuring after market and original equipment manufacturer (OEM) equipment used by supermarkets, convenience stores convenience stores and retail outlets; Electronic retailing services via computer featuring after market and original equipment manufacturer (OEM) equipment for supermarkets, convenience store and retail outlets through the use of a global network; and on-line distributorship via computer featuring after market and original equipment manufacturer (OEM) equipment used by supermarkets, convenience stores and retail outlets; global computer network website which offer after market and original equipment manufacturer (OEM) equipment utilized by supermarkets, convenience stores and retail outlets, said website to be used to track and calculate customer purchases and associated shipping costs made over a global network | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by StoreParts.com. LLC
- Other trademarks owned by StoreParts.com. LLC
- Other trademarks owned by MRO LOGIC, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named PARTSCART
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 23, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 6, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 11, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 3, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 13, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 18, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 29, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 31, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 17, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |