Drawing for FORSIGHT

USPTO serial 75887988

FORSIGHT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HOWARD, CHERYL L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FORSIGHT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert J. Kenney

ROBERT J KENNEY BIRCH, STEWART, KOLASCH & BIRCH, LLPP O BOX 747FALLS CHURCH, VA 22040-0747UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009EYE GLASSES AND CONTACT LENSESACTIVE—
035RETAIL SALE EYEGLASSES AND CONTACT LENSESACTIVE—
042OPTOMETRY SERVICES, NAMELY, EYE EXAMINATION, TREATMENT OF EYE DISEASE, LASER VISION SURGERY, AND MANAGEMENT AND CONSULTATION OF LASER VISION CORRECTIONACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 1, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 4, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Nov 6, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 6, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 1, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 1, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 15, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 13, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 21, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 21, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance