Drawing for RADICCHIO

USPTO serial 75888493

RADICCHIO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BOAGNI, MARY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RADICCHIO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jarnie R. Shelden

SUSAN BERNEY-KEY COOLEY GODWARD LLP4401 EASTGATE MALLSAN DIEGO, CA 92121-1909UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Telecommunication and data transmission networks, apparatus and instruments used in telecommunications and data transmissions, namely cell phones, card phones, telephones and modems; encoded electronic chip cards [smart cards] containing programming used in secure wireless transactions in the field of electronic and mobile commerce, and magnetic coded cards; computer programs and software for enabling secure wireless transactions in the field of electronic and mobile commerce; computer peripherals; computers and data processorsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 19, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 20, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 23, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 3, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 1, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 9, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 9, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 21, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 21, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 1, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance