USPTO serial 75890166
ESPA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWELL, LINDA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ESPA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | Beauty salons, namely, hairdressing salons, hair cutting, hairdressing services, cosmetician services, skin care salons | ACTIVE | Sep 3, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 13, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 13, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 14, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 6, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 7, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 13, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 5, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 29, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |