USPTO serial 75890698
ISOFT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ISOFT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ira S. Saul
IRA S SAUL IRA S SAUL, PLC8027 LEESBURG PIKE, STE 207VIENNA, VA 22182-2710UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN THIRD PARTY BILLING APPLICATIONS IN THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND UTILITIES INDUSTRIES, NAMELY, COMPUTER CONVERGENT BILLING SOFTWARE FOR USE IN INTEGRATING CUSTOMER BILLING INFORMATION FROM MULTIPLE SOURCES AND IN GENERATING ONE OR MORE CONVERGENT CUSTOMER BILLS, AND COMPUTER CONVERGENT REVENUE ASSURANCE SOFTWARE FOR USE IN IDENTIFYING CUSTOMER UNDERBILLINGS AND OVERBILLINGS FROM SINGLE OR MULTIPLE SOURCES AND GENERATING CONVERGENT UNDERBILLING AND OVERBILLING REPORTS | ACTIVE | Mar 12, 1999 |
| 042 | DESIGN OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR OTHERS, NAMELY, DESIGNING COMPUTER SOFTWARE THAT INTERFACES DATABASES WITH FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE FOR OTHERS AND DESIGNING COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN THIRD PARTY BILLING APPLICATIONS IN THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND UTILITIES INDUSTRY FOR OTHERS | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 2, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 11, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |