Drawing for HIGHNETS

USPTO serial 75892677

HIGHNETS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DONINGER, CHRISTOPHER G
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HIGHNETS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JAMES T HOSMER

JAMES T HOSMER NIXON & VANDERHYE PC1100 N GLEBE RD 8TH FLARLINGTON, VA 22201-4714UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN TRACKING AND MANAGING INDIVIDUAL INVESTMENT PORTFOLIOS, EVALUATING INDIVIDUAL NET WORTH, DETERMINING PROPERTY VALUATIONS, ANALYZING AND PROJECTING RETURNS ON INVESTMENTS, COORDINATING AND MANAGING PERSONAL AND BUSINESS SERVICES PROVIDED TO HIGH NET WORTH INDIVIDUALS AND THEIR FAMILIES, AND CONDUCTING INVESTMENT RISK ANALYSES FOR USE IN THE FIELD OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, NAMELY, WEALTH MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT SERVICES, AND PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR HIGH NET WORTH INDIVIDUALSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 14, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 14, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 20, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 1, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jul 1, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 17, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 31, 2003EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 31, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 1, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 30, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 30, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 30, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 24, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 3, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 1, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 9, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 19, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 21, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 28, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 28, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 7, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 5, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance