USPTO serial 75895117
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rodney F. Brown
RODNEY F BROWN3365 BALTIMORE STSAN DIEGO, CA 92117UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SOFTWARE FOR MANAGING AND DISTRIBUTING OTHER SOFTWARE TO DEVICES IN A NETWORK, NAMELY, SECOND GENERATION MOBILE TELEPHONES, THIRD GENERATION MOBILE TELEPHONES, PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANTS, MOBILE NETWORK COMPUTERS, FIXED WIRE NETWORK COMPUTERS, WEB SERVERS, WEB PORTALS, WAP SERVERS AND SET TOP DIGITAL BOXES | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 10, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 16, 2000 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 15, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |