USPTO serial 75896205
COLONVADE S.A.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PIGNATELLO, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COLONVADE S.A.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CP 11200 Montevideo, UY
CP 11200 Montevideo, UY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Teresa J. Wiant
TERESA J WIANT PATENT DEPT CH2J29WEYERHAEUSER COMPANYP O BOX 9777FEDERAL WAY, WA 98063-9777Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | (Based on Intent to Use and Based on 44(e)) WOOD PULP AND WOOD FIBER FOR MANUFACTURING PURPOSES | ACTIVE | — |
| 004 | (Based on Intent to Use) FUELS, NAMELY, WOOD CHIPS FOR USE AS FUEL AND WOOD FOR BURNING | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | (Based on Intent to Use) PAPER GOODS, NAMELY, CARTONS AND CONTAINERS MADE OF LINERBOARD AND CORRUGATED PAPERBOARD | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | (Based on Intent to Use and Based on 44(e)) NON-METALLIC BUILDING MATERIALS, NAMELY, LUMBER AND PLYWOOD | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Colonvade S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Colonvade S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named COLONVADE S.A.
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 21, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 5, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 26, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 11, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 21, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 19, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 27, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 7, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 20, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |