USPTO serial 75897210
D.U.G.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, GEORGE M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with D.U.G.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Chesterfield, MO
NEW YORK, NY
NEW YORK, NY
Jamaica, NY
Rosedale, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LINDSAY E COHEN
LINDSAY E COHEN SENNIGER POWERS LEAVITT & ROEDELONE METROPOLITAN SQ 16TH FLST LOUIS, MO 63102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing for men, women and children, namely, after ski boots, ascots, athletic footwear, athletic shoes, athletic uniforms, head bands, neck bands, sweat bands, wrist bands, bathing suits, bathrobes, beachwear, bed jackets, belts, berets, bermuda shorts, bikinis, blouses, blousons, body suits, boots, bow ties, boxer shorts, brassieres, underwear briefs, bustiers, camisoles, clothing caps, cardigans, chemises, coats, fur jackets, fur stoles, leather coats, over coats, rain coats, suit coats, corsets, cravats, culottes, dresses, evening gowns, night gowns, ear muffs, espadrilles, footwear, gloves, hats, head wear, jeans, jogging suits, kilts, lingerie, clothing mantles, moccasins, neckerchiefs, night shirts, pajamas, pants, pantyhose, pareu, parkas, polo shirts, pullovers, sandals, shoes, shorts, ski wear, slippers, slips, socks, stockings, T-shirts, sweaters, sweatpants, sweatshirts, swimsuits, tankinis, tights, tops, unitards, vests and wristbands | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kellwood Company
- Other trademarks owned by D.U.G. DOWNUND'R GEAR, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by D.U.G. DOWNUND'R GEAR, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Stoney, Michael
- Other trademarks owned by Johnson, Jonathan
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named D.U.G.
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 4, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 20, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 20, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 8, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 29, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 15, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 10, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 29, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 6, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 17, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 3, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 24, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 12, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 5, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |