USPTO serial 75897548
A-SENTINAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAINT, MARY CATHERINE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with A-SENTINAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NATAN EPSTEIN
NATAN EPSTEIN LAW OFFICES OF NATAN EPSTEINTRIDENT CTR 9TH FL11377 W OLYMPIC BLVDLOS ANGELES, CA 90064-1625Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Radio frequency identification products, namely, plastic cards, and card readers for access to restricted areas and for asset and personal identification and tracking | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 11, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 23, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 5, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 23, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 23, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 10, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 20, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |