Drawing for IVILLAGETV

USPTO serial 75898604

IVILLAGETV

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMITH, BRIDGETT G
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IVILLAGETV?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

BRADFORD S BREEN

BRADFORD S BREEN ORRICK HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP666 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10103-0001UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Production of radio and television programs; entertainment services, namely, providing radio and television programs in the field of news and topics of interest to women by means of a global computer networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 28, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 28, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 23, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 23, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 23, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 1, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 12, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 21, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 11, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 24, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 24, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 23, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 23, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 13, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 26, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 26, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 2, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 12, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 29, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 20, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 13, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 20, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 30, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 21, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance