USPTO serial 75907849
TOGA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TOGA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sandra Epp Ryan
SANDRA EPP RYAN MERCHANT & GOULD PCP O BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Textiles, namely, fabrics for use in the manufacture of garments, furnishings, linens and interior decorations; textile goods, namely, towels, napkins, place mats, pot holders, unfitted furniture covers, shower curtains, window treatments, namely, curtains, draperies and valances; bed covers, namely, sheets, pillow cases, comforter covers, duvets, duvet covers, shams, bedspreads, bed skirts, dust ruffles, bed canopies, bed blankets, comforters, throws and quilts; table covers, namely, table cloths, table runners | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 10, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 25, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 4, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 4, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 5, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 14, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 19, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 30, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 27, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 21, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |