USPTO serial 75908100
TALKFLOW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2869895Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 3, 2004
- Examiner
- YARD, JOHN S
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TALKFLOW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert E. Rosenthal
Robert E. Rosenthal Howard IP Law Group, PCPO Box 226Fort Washington, PA 19034UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for receiving, distributing, categorizing, and storing telephone and electronic calls and messages and making messages available for retrieval and for classification, organization, and standardization of communications, messages, and other business information | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Aug 6, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2009 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | ES7S | TEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 4, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 3, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 26, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 26, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 1, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 17, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 23, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 24, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 5, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 30, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 29, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 30, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |