USPTO serial 75909141
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
C. Forbes Sargent III
C FORBES SARGENT III SHERIN AND LODGEN, LLP100 SUMMER STBOSTON, MA 02110UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer services, namely providing consumers with ongoing updates of computer, consumer electronics and product pricing information by means of a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2003 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| May 9, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |