USPTO serial 75911945
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Grand Rapids, MI
Grand Rapids, MI
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ingrid A Jensen
INGRID A JENSEN LAW WEATHERS & RICHARDSON PC333 BRIDGE ST NW STE 800GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49504UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Soft drinks, fruit juices, fruit drinks and syrups and other preparations for making the same | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 20, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 13, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 23, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 30, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 10, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 2, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 5, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |