Drawing for STRONGWOMEN

USPTO serial 75915668

STRONGWOMEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TANNER, MICHAEL R
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STRONGWOMEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas V. Smurzynski

THOMAS V SMURZYNSKI LAHIVE & COCKFIELD, LLP28 STATE STBOSTON, MA 02109UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely t-shirts, sweatshirts, sweatpants, shorts, sweat suits, exercise jackets, hats, gloves, long sleeve shirts, short sleeve shirts, socks, sports bras, pants, tights, leggingsACTIVE—
028Manually operated exercise equipment, namely barbells, dumbbells, free exercise weights, weight lifting benches, exercise weight cuffs, ankle weights, sport exercise balls, exercise platforms, namely exercise steps, elastic resistive exercise bands, straps, and tubing for the arms and legs; exercise machines and equipment, namely stationary exercise bicycles, multi-station exercise equipment comprising weight lifting benches and exercise machines, exercise treadmills, elliptical trainers, and rowing machinesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 7, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 23, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 6, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 6, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 6, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 14, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 24, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 23, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 22, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 18, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 9, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 8, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 31, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 1, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 5, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance