USPTO serial 75918835
SMARTGIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARROLL, DORITT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SMARTGIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
B. Brett Heavner
B BRETT HEAVNER FINNEGAN HENDERSON FARABOW ET AL1300 I ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3314UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 15, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 15, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 13, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 20, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 10, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 27, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 20, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 5, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 3, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 21, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |