USPTO serial 75920784
DR. DOLITTLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPILS, CAROL A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DR. DOLITTLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Monica, CA
Santa Monica, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel M. Cislo
DANIEL M CISLO CISLO & THOMAS, LLP233 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 900SANTA MONICA, CA 90401-1211UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer game cartridges; computer game disks; computer game programs | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | Jewelry | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, shirts, Halloween costumes | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Toys, namely, board games, card games, dolls, dolls for children and adults, doll accessories, doll costumes; electric action toys; electronically operated toy vehicles; pet toys | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Meat; clam juices; fruit-based snack foods; potato-based snack foods; snack dips | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Cakes; candy; ice cream; processed cereal; cereal-based snack foods; rice-based snack foods; wheat-based snack food | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Unprocessed cereal; pet food; pet flavorings for additional pet food | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Fruit juices; vegetable juices; soda | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Reznick, Jerald
- Other trademarks owned by Reznick, Jerald
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named DR. DOLITTLE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 28, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 11, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 12, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 12, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 18, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 22, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 2, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 11, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 20, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 30, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |