USPTO serial 75927556
THE REAL DEAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE REAL DEAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mitchell P. Brook
MITCHELL P BROOK BAKER & MCKENZIE101 W BROADWAY12TH FLSAN DIEGO, CA 92101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, including, tops, bottoms, headwear, footwear and outerwear | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Sporting goods, including, skateboards, snowboards, surfboards, wake boards, snow skis, water skis, bicycles and accessories therefor; toys, including, miniature toy vehicles such as miniature skateboards, snowboards, surfboards, wake boards, skis, bicycles, airplanes, automobiles, buses, vans, trucks, trains, scooters, motorcycles, boats, snow mobiles, recreational watercraft, all-terrain vehicles, and accessories therefor; toy action figures, toy figures, toy statuettes, dolls, miniature toy structures such as buildings, signs and accessories therefor, inflatable toys, inflatable children's furniture, bean bags | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 17, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |