USPTO serial 75931410
MICROCELL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, HEATHER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MICROCELL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEVEN J. HULTQUIST
STEVEN J HULTQUIST INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY/TECHNOLOGY LAWP 0 BOX 14329RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC 27709UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Power source and energy supply devices, namely fibrous fuel cells, fibrous batteries, and energy storage fuel cells | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 31, 2004 | RECG | ACTION GRANTING REQ. FOR RECON. MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 3, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 29, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 31, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 24, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |