Drawing for AMERICAN EQUITY MORTGAGE

USPTO serial 75933854

AMERICAN EQUITY MORTGAGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AMERICAN EQUITY MORTGAGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ned W Randle

NED W RANDLE POLSTER LIEDER WOODRUFF & LUCCHESI763 S NEW BALLAS RDST LOUIS, MO 63141UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036MORTGAGE BANKING SERVICESACTIVEFeb 14, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 12, 2020ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 23, 2018ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 16, 2018FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jan 24, 2018ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 5, 2001EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Sep 10, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 10, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 29, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jun 14, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 14, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 6, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 16, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 16, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance