USPTO serial 75934617
EPOST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPILS, CAROL A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EPOST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Ottawa, Ontario K1A OB1, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce E. O'Connor
CHRISTENSEN O'CONNOR JOHNSON ET AL1420 FIFTH AVE STE 2800SEATTLE, WA 98101-2347UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for encrypting and decrypting messages, information and data; computer software for receiving, processing and delivering electronic messages, information and data | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | AN ENCRYPTED SERVICE AVAILABLE OVER THE INTERNET WHERE COMPANIES OR ORGANIZATIONS CAN SECURELY PRESENT BILLS, COMMERCIAL OR GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTS TO CLIENTS, AND WHERE CLIENTS CAN SECURELY RECEIVE, PAY AND/OR PROCESS THESE BILLS OR DOCUMENTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 25, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 24, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 23, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |