USPTO serial 75937927
NATURAL FROM SOURCE TO SHELF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHICOSKI, JENNIFER D
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NATURAL FROM SOURCE TO SHELF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ALLEN J. BADEN
ALLEN J BADEN KENYON & KENYONONE BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | DIETARY AND HERBAL SUPPLEMENTS IN TABLET, CAPSULE, SOFT GEL, POWDER, PASTE AND LIQUID FORM | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 10, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 6, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 7, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 17, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 23, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 22, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 17, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |