USPTO serial 75975176
FAQS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLYNN, GERALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FAQS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark Harrison
MARK HARRISON SPENCER, FRANK & SCHNEIDERSTE 300 E1100 NEW YORK AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3955Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | books in the fields of computers, computing and computer software | ACTIVE | Jul 25, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 5, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 5, 2001 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 10, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 3, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 1997 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 13, 1997 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 13, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 3, 1996 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 3, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 1996 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 3, 1996 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 7, 1996 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |