USPTO serial 75976877
DRS TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 27, 1999
- Examiner
- KING, ELIZABETH WOOD
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with DRS TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ARLINGTON, VA
PARSIPPANY, NJ
Diagnostic/Retrieval Systems, Inc.
Parsippany, NJ
Other trademarks owned by Diagnostic/Retrieval Systems, Inc.
Diagnostic/Retrieval Systems, Inc.
Parsippany, NJ
Other trademarks owned by Diagnostic/Retrieval Systems, Inc.
Diagnostic/Retrieval Systems, Inc.
Parsippany, NJ
Other trademarks owned by Diagnostic/Retrieval Systems, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alicia Grahn Jones
Alicia Grahn Jones Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP1100 Peachtree Street, Suite 2800MAILSTOP: IP DOCKETING - 22Atlanta, GA 30309-4528Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | repair services, namely, maintenance, repair, and installation of electronic component devices, assemblies and systems, namely, sonar systems, combat systems, radar systems, magnetic video recording rotary head scanner assemblies and broadcast quality video recording devices and parts therefor; refurbishing and rebuilding machines that have been worn or partially destroyed, namely, electronic component devices and assemblies, namely, sonar systems, combat systems, radar systems, magnetic video recording rotary head scanner assemblies, broadcast quality video recording devices, magnetic broadcast audio heads, magnetic flight recorder heads and magnetic strip card readers for defense and commercial markets, commercial upper drum and rotary head scanner assemblies for television broadcast and post-production facilities | ACTIVE | Mar 25, 1997 |
| 040 | manufacture of computer hardware, electronic devices and electronic assemblies, namely, acoustic, sonar, radar, tactical, combat, navigational and infrared signal processors, recorders and sensors, acoustic video display systems, mission data recorders, optical systems, complex cables, cable harnesses and circuit cards, magnetic broadcast audio heads, magnetic flight recorder heads and magnetic strip card readers to the order and specification of others, namely, military, industrial and commercial users; manufacture of commercial video recording products, to the order and specification of others, namely, for television and post-production facilities | ACTIVE | Mar 25, 1997 |
| 041 | educational services, namely, training end-users in the use and operation of computer hardware, computer software and electronic devices, namely, sonar systems, data recording and processing systems | ACTIVE | Mar 25, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LEONARDO DRS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by DRS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Diagnostic/Retrieval Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Diagnostic/Retrieval Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Diagnostic/Retrieval Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named DRS TECHNOLOGIES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2020 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2020 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 11, 2020 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 10, 2020 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2020 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 27, 2020 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Jan 23, 2020 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 19, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 13, 2009 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 13, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| May 31, 2005 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| May 31, 2005 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2002 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 13, 2002 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Sep 6, 2001 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jul 27, 1999 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 4, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 2, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 30, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 30, 1999 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 1998 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 1998 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 26, 1998 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 26, 1998 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 20, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 10, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |