USPTO serial 75980045
21E
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with 21E?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | ADVERTISING THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS, MARKETING AND SALE OF THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS | ACTIVE | Jul 23, 1999 |
| 038 | BROADCASTING SERVICES VIA COMPUTER NETWORKS, GLOBAL COMMUNICATION NETWORKS, SATELLITES, AND FIBER DISTRIBUTION, PROVIDING NEWS AND PUBLIC INFORMATION, WEBCASTING PROPERTIES LIVE EVENTS AND OTHER INFORMATION IN A WIDE VARIETY OF FIELDS ON COMPUTER NETWORKS, GLOBAL COMMUNICATION NETWORKS, SATELLITES AND FIBER DISTRIBUTION; UTILIZING AN INFRASTRUCTURE OF PEERING SERVERS LOCATED NATIONALLY TO ACCEPT A VIDEO STREAM, STORING CONTENT IN A SOFTWARE FORMAT TO DISTRIBUTE ENTERTAINMENT AND COMMERCE TO A DESK TOP, TELEVISION, SET TOP BOX APPARATUS OR ANY OTHER DEVICE THAT RECEIVES INTERNET CONNECTION VIA VIDEO STREAM | ACTIVE | Jul 23, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 17, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 17, 2000 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 25, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2000 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |