USPTO serial 75980890
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Chicago, IL
Chicago, IL
Markham, Ontario L3R0G7, CA
Chicago, IL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert C. Freed
Robert C. Freed MOORE & HANSEN, PLLC225 SOUTH SIXTH STREETSUITE 4850MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-4612| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | [ hair and skin care products, namely, facial moisturizer, bath and shower gel, body scrub, body mud, non-medicated bath salts, hair shampoo, hair conditioner, hair styling gels, hair spray, hair lotion, hair moisturizer, hair pomade, hair colorant, scalp oil treatment ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 005 | [ vitamins and herbal supplements ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | body treatment services, namely, massages, manicuring and pedicuring, skin care salons and hairdressing salons | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 23, 2022 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 18, 2012 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2012 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 18, 2012 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 16, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 7, 2012 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| May 20, 2008 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| May 20, 2008 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 15, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 13, 2001 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 20, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2000 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 21, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 28, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 22, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 22, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 29, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 28, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 17, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 8, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 20, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |