USPTO serial 75981359
BIKINI.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORENO, PAUL A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BIKINI.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NANCY M. DODDERIDGE
HOWARD SONNENSCHEIN421 HUDSON ST STE 520NEW YORK, NY 10014UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Calendars | ACTIVE | Sep 15, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ALL STAR MEDIA LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Sunshine Media Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by Sunshine Media Corp.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named BIKINI.COM
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 10, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 22, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 10, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 13, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 4, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 22, 1999 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 22, 1999 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 1999 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 22, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 17, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 1999 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 13, 1999 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 17, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 25, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 24, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 12, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 27, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |