USPTO serial 75981540
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Snell Medical Communication Inc.
Montreal, Quebec H3G 1L7, CA
Snell Medical Communication Inc.
Montreal, Quebec H3G 1L7, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PETER KATZ
PETER KATZ DAY, BERRY & HOWARD, LLP260 FRANKLIN STBOSTON, MA 02110UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | computer services, namely, providing an on-line newsletter in the field of nephrology | ACTIVE | Dec 20, 2000 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 2003 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 5, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 31, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 19, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 9, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2001 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jun 18, 2001 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2001 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 6, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 6, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2000 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 27, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 1999 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 6, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 6, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 14, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 12, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 29, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 27, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |