USPTO serial 75981827
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Janice W. Housey
JANICE W HOUSEY PIPER MARBURY RUDNICK & WOLFE LLP1200 1 9 TH ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | TELECOMMUNICATIONS, NAMELY, BROADCASTING OF SOUND, CABLE AND TELEVISION PROGRAMS, ALSO FOR INTERACTIVE USE, AND ALSO VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK, PROVIDING AN E-COMMERCE PLATFORM ON THE INTERNET, PROVIDING INTERNET PORTALS, PROVIDING MULTIPLE USER ACCESS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK, PROVIDING A TELESHOPPING CHANNEL, VIDEOTEXT SERVICES, COLLECTING AND PROVIDING INFORMATION ON THE INTERNET, ALSO FOR INTERACTIVE USE, AS SERVICES OF AN INTERNET PROVIDER, TRANSFER OF CUSTOMER, ORDERING, TIME AND SAMPLE DATA VIA SATELLITE, CABLE OR DIGITAL TERRESTRIAL, ELECTRONIC NEWS TRANSFER, E-MAIL DATA SERVICES, RADIO SERVICES, TELEPHONE SERVICES, TELECOMMUNICATION VIA FIBER-OPTICAL NETWORKS, FORWARDING OF TELEPHONE CALLS, INFORMATION SERVICES, SMS SERVICES, CELLULAR AND MOBILE PHONE SERVICES, PAGING SERVICES, SATELLITE TRANSMISSIONS; POINT-TO-POINT AND POINT-TO-MULTIPOINT COMMUNICATION SERVICES; LEASING AND RENTAL OF TELECOMMUNICATION DEVICES, NAMELY, DEVICES FOR AN AUTOMATIC ORDERING SYSTEM, SET-TOP BOXES, TELEPHONES AND SATELLITES; TELECASTS AND VIDEOS ON DEMAND VIA PAY-PER-VIEW, PAY-TV VIA PACKAGE ORIENTED TRANSMISSION, AND VIDEO-ON-DEMAND, VIA CABLE, SATELLITE AND DIGITAL TERRESTRIAL | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 3, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 16, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |