Drawing for STARZONE

USPTO serial 75981827

STARZONE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WEIMER, CAROLINE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with STARZONE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Janice W. Housey

JANICE W HOUSEY PIPER MARBURY RUDNICK & WOLFE LLP1200 1 9 TH ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038TELECOMMUNICATIONS, NAMELY, BROADCASTING OF SOUND, CABLE AND TELEVISION PROGRAMS, ALSO FOR INTERACTIVE USE, AND ALSO VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK, PROVIDING AN E-COMMERCE PLATFORM ON THE INTERNET, PROVIDING INTERNET PORTALS, PROVIDING MULTIPLE USER ACCESS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK, PROVIDING A TELESHOPPING CHANNEL, VIDEOTEXT SERVICES, COLLECTING AND PROVIDING INFORMATION ON THE INTERNET, ALSO FOR INTERACTIVE USE, AS SERVICES OF AN INTERNET PROVIDER, TRANSFER OF CUSTOMER, ORDERING, TIME AND SAMPLE DATA VIA SATELLITE, CABLE OR DIGITAL TERRESTRIAL, ELECTRONIC NEWS TRANSFER, E-MAIL DATA SERVICES, RADIO SERVICES, TELEPHONE SERVICES, TELECOMMUNICATION VIA FIBER-OPTICAL NETWORKS, FORWARDING OF TELEPHONE CALLS, INFORMATION SERVICES, SMS SERVICES, CELLULAR AND MOBILE PHONE SERVICES, PAGING SERVICES, SATELLITE TRANSMISSIONS; POINT-TO-POINT AND POINT-TO-MULTIPOINT COMMUNICATION SERVICES; LEASING AND RENTAL OF TELECOMMUNICATION DEVICES, NAMELY, DEVICES FOR AN AUTOMATIC ORDERING SYSTEM, SET-TOP BOXES, TELEPHONES AND SATELLITES; TELECASTS AND VIDEOS ON DEMAND VIA PAY-PER-VIEW, PAY-TV VIA PACKAGE ORIENTED TRANSMISSION, AND VIDEO-ON-DEMAND, VIA CABLE, SATELLITE AND DIGITAL TERRESTRIALACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 4, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 3, 2003CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 28, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 16, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 18, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 18, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 26, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 18, 2002CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 28, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 6, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 1, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 26, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 19, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 15, 2002DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 14, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 14, 2001DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Mar 14, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance