USPTO serial 75982293
SQUAREBLES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, AMY E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SQUAREBLES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Warren N. Low
WARREN N LOW LOW AND LOWP O BOX 2184ARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY, T-SHIRTS | ACTIVE | Mar 14, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 24, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 16, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 11, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 21, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 21, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 28, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 26, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 28, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 27, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 1999 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 22, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |