Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 75982599?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/75982599. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns CHICAGO STYLE?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 75982599, the listed owner(s) include: Sheena Ventures, L.L.C..

What is USPTO serial number 75982599?

Serial number 75982599 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark CHICAGO STYLE. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

Which trademark classes cover CHICAGO STYLE?

The public record lists International Classes: 025, 029, 030, 042. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

Trademark: CHICAGO STYLE Serial# 75982599 | status 601; last event ABN1 | Trademark Info & Attorney Guidance

Q: What is the current status of CHICAGO STYLE?

CHICAGO STYLE (75982599) currently shows USPTO status code 601 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHICAGO STYLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Sheena Ventures, L.L.C.
Farmington Hills, MI
Other trademarks owned by Sheena Ventures, L.L.C.

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James E. Bergesen, Esq.

JAMES E BERGESEN ESQ BERGESEN & CLARK3250 W BIG BEAVER RD SUTE 303TROY, MI 48084-2909UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
025	Tee-Shirts, sweatshirts and hats	ACTIVE	May 13, 1998
029	Chicken, beef and pork preparations; sausages	ACTIVE	May 13, 1998
030	Pizza, pizza sauces, Italian and Greek style spices; oil based salad dressings	ACTIVE	May 13, 1998
042	Dine-in and Carry-out restaurant services	ACTIVE	May 13, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Feb 9, 2004	ABN1	ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED	—
Dec 16, 2003	CFIT	CASE FILE IN TICRS	—
Nov 12, 2003	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Nov 12, 2003	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
May 12, 2003	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 2003	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Mar 10, 2003	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Mar 10, 2003	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 11, 2002	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2002	DPCC	DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE	—
Oct 28, 2001	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Oct 25, 2001	DRRR	DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED	—
Oct 25, 2001	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
May 16, 2001	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
May 16, 2001	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 20, 2001	PETG	PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED	—
Aug 11, 2000	PETR	PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED	—
Jun 20, 2000	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 14, 1999	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 7, 1999	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
May 27, 1999	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—

CHICAGO STYLE