USPTO serial 75982820
S.W.A.T.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3085722Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 25, 2006
- Examiner
- KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with S.W.A.T.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
KINGSPORT, TN
KINGSPORT, TN
Kingsport, TN
Kingsport, TN
Kingsport, TN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert O. Fox
Robert O. Fox Luedeka, Neely & Graham P.C.P.O. Box 1871Knoxville, TN 37901UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Flashlights | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 13, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TAYLOR BRANDS LLC
- Other trademarks owned by TAYLOR BRANDS LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Taylor, Stewart A.
- Other trademarks owned by Taylor, Stewart A.
- Other trademarks owned by Taylor, Stewart A.
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named S.W.A.T.
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 29, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 23, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 13, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 17, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 7, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 25, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 2, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 20, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 26, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 6, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 11, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 23, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 18, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 28, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 3, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 4, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |