USPTO serial 75983338
MAGNEMOTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 3, 2004
- Examiner
- PAPPAS, MATTHEW
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with MAGNEMOTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elisabeth Townsend Bridge
Elisabeth Townsend Bridge Amundsen Davis LLC111 E. Kilbourn AveSuite 1400Milwaukee, WI 53202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electromagnetic transporting systems, namely both linear synchronous motors to propel and levitate pallets, containers and vehicles, all of all sizes, by means of electromagnetism, namely the interaction of magnet arrays with electrical coils, and the guidance of pallets, containers and vehicles, all of all sizes, by means of electromagnetism, namely the interaction of magnet arrays with steel rails and/or electrical coils; communications and electrical power transfer systems, each comprised of electromagnetic couplings between two magnetic structures, namely a current in a primary winding on a ferromagnetic core that induces a current into a secondary winding on a nearby ferromagnetic core in the field of electromagnetic transporting systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | [ Business consulting in the field of business and engineering, namely, logistics planning services in the field of electromagnetic transporting systems, namely both linear synchronous motors to propel and levitate pallets, containers and vehicles, all of all sizes, by means of electromagnetism, namely the interaction of magnet arrays with electrical coils and the guidance of pallets, containers and vehicles, all of all sizes, by means of electromagnetism, namely the interaction of magnet arrays with steel rails and/or electrical coils ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 1996 |
| 037 | [ Maintenance of electromagnetic systems, namely magnet arrays that interact with steel rails and/or electrical coils; maintenance of communication, power transfer and electromagnetic controls, contactless position sensors, and software for use in electromagnetic systems, namely magnet arrays that interact with steel rails and/or electrical coils, and electromagnetic transporting systems, namely both linear synchronous motors to propel and levitate pallets, containers and vehicles, all of all sizes, by means of electromagnetism, namely the interaction of magnet arrays with electrical coils and the guidance of pallets, containers and vehicles, all of all sizes, by means of electromagnetism, namely the interaction of magnet arrays with steel rails and/or electrical coils ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 1996 |
| 040 | [ Custom manufacture of electromagnetic systems, namely magnet arrays that interact with steel rails and/or electrical coils; custom manufacture of communication, power transfer, and electromagnetic controls, contactless position sensors and software all for use in the field of electromagnetic systems, namely magnet arrays that interact with steel rails and/or electrical coils, and electromagnetic transporting systems, namely both linear synchronous motors to propel and levitate pallets, containers and vehicles, all of all sizes, by means of electromagnetism, namely the interaction of magnet arrays with electrical coils and the guidance of pallets, containers and vehicles, all of all sizes, by means of electromagnetism, namely the interaction of magnet arrays with steel rails and/or electrical coils ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 1996 |
| 042 | [ Engineering services; software design, for others, for use in communication, power transfer, and electromagnetic controls, contactless position sensors and software all in the field of electromagnetic systems, namely the interaction of magnet arrays with steel rails and/or electrical coils, and electromagnetic transporting systems, namely both linear synchronous motors to propel and levitate pallets, containers and vehicles, all of all sizes, by means of electromagnetism, namely the interaction of magnet arrays with electrical coils and the guidance of pallets, containers and vehicles, all of all sizes, by means of electromagnetism, namely the interaction of magnet arrays with electrical coils ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MagneMotion Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ROCKWELL AUTOMATION INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MagneMotion Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by MagneMotion Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MAGNEMOTION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2025 | NP89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF PARTIAL SEC. 8 & 9 EMAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2025 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 13, 2025 | 9G8P | REGISTERED - SEC. 9 GRANTED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8 | — |
| Mar 13, 2025 | 8PRT | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 13, 2025 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2025 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Mar 12, 2025 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 12, 2025 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 17, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2024 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Oct 30, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 2, 2024 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2023 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2014 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2014 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 20, 2014 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 20, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 4, 2014 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 15, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 19, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 19, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 10, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 21, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 17, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 20, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 11, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 30, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |