Drawing for HEALTHMETRICS

USPTO serial 76000371

HEALTHMETRICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ENGEL, MICHAEL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HEALTHMETRICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael J. Bevilacqua

HARVEY A ASHMAN IMS HEALTH660 W GERMANTOWN PIKEPLYMOUTH MEETING, PA 19462UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Computer services, namely, providing an on-line database of medical and prescription healthcare data for payers, providers, pharmaceutical companies and managed care organizations for the purpose of analyzing drug, diagnosis and treatment patterns, and resource utilization through the complete episode of disease and full continuum of careACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 10, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 6, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 30, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 12, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 27, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 27, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 7, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 10, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 28, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 13, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 17, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 17, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 28, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 6, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 16, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 26, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 8, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 8, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 24, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 9, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 15, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 13, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 1, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 11, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 23, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 23, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 23, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 12, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 11, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance