USPTO serial 76006327
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven T. Shelton
STEVEN T SHELTON CLIFFORD CHANCE ROGERS & WELLS LLP200 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10166-0153UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising agency services; consulting services regarding customer relation and satisfaction; business management consulting services, namely, creating business marketing, electronic commerce and information management plans for others, development and execution of online global computer network strategies; market research services, accounting, payroll preparation, bookkeeping and tax consulting services, operation of customer service support centers for others provided via a global computer network, voice communication or e-mail | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Financial services, namely, billing, debt recovery and debt collections, credit reporting services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, designing, creating, implementing, and maintaining web sites for others; hosting the websites of others on a computer server for a global computer network; internet service provider services, technical support services, namely trouble shooting of computer hardware and software problems via a global computer network, voice communication, or e-mail; legal services; legal counseling services, design and testing of new products for others, design and testing for new product development; integration, implementation, and logistics related to new product development; and consulting services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |