Drawing for SMART SENSOR

USPTO serial 76006896

SMART SENSOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REIHNER, DAVID
Law office
INTENT TO USE UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMART SENSOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark. B. Garred

MARK B GARRED STETINA BRUNDA GARRED & BRUCKER75 ENTERPRISE STE 250ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028INTERACTIVE ELECTRONIC ACTION TOYSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 28, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 28, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 29, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 22, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 18, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Oct 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 20, 2003EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 20, 2003EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 30, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 11, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 18, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 6, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 10, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 20, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 23, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 31, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 18, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 10, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 12, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 7, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 31, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 29, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance