USPTO serial 76008468
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Santa Clara, CA
Santa Clara, CA
Santa Clara, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patricia L. Cotton
PATRICIA L COTTON PILLSBURY WINTHROP LLP2550 HANOVER STPALO ALTO, CA 94304-1115UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | DATA PROCESSORS THAT ENABLE MULTIMEDIA FILES TO BE DOWNLOADED FROM SERVERS IN A STREAM, FOR USE IN BROADBAND SET TOP BOXES AND MULTIMEDIA DEVICES, NAMELY, DIGITAL TELEVISIONS, PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANTS, WEB PADS WHICH ARE HAND HELD COMPUTERS DESIGNED FOR INTERNET USE, AND INTERNET APPLIANCES WHICH ARE COMPUTERS DESIGNED ONLY FOR INTERNET USE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 19, 2000 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 28, 2003 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| May 8, 2003 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| May 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 27, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 27, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 9, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 8, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 21, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |