Drawing for GAME SHOW ARE YOU READY TO PLAY?

USPTO serial 76018873

GAME SHOW ARE YOU READY TO PLAY?

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KING, LINDA M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with GAME SHOW ARE YOU READY TO PLAY??

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

T. MICHAEL WICKERSHAM

T MICHAEL WICKERSHAM MARK L BEIGELMAN PC777 THIRD AVE 24TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment in the nature of an interactive game show theater productionABANDONEDMar 16, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 21, 2003OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 13, 2003ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Mar 13, 2003ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Mar 13, 2003OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 13, 2003OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jan 28, 2003OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 28, 2003OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 17, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 27, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 19, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 16, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 5, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 5, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 1, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 1, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 30, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 29, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 5, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 17, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance