USPTO serial 76019449
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Montreal, Quebec, CA
ENTREPRISES DE RECHERCHE, FABRICATION ET ANALYSES (ERFA) INC.
Westmount, Quebec, CA
Other trademarks owned by ENTREPRISES DE RECHERCHE, FABRICATION ET ANALYSES (ERFA) INC.
ENTREPRISES DE RECHERCHE, FABRICATION ET ANALYSES (ERFA) INC.
Westmount, Quebec, CA
Other trademarks owned by ENTREPRISES DE RECHERCHE, FABRICATION ET ANALYSES (ERFA) INC.
ENTREPRISES DE RECHERCHE, FABRICATION ET ANALYSES (ERFA) INC.
Westmount, Quebec, CA
Other trademarks owned by ENTREPRISES DE RECHERCHE, FABRICATION ET ANALYSES (ERFA) INC.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan D. Rector
Susan D. Rector Schottenstein, Zox & Dunn Co., L.P.A.250 West StreetColumbus, OH 43215-2538UNITED STATESCopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 11, 2003 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 21, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 1, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |