USPTO serial 76023920
TI-TIRE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TI-TIRE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul J. Reilly
PAUL J REILLY BAKER BOTTS LLP30 ROCKEFELLER PLZNEW YORK, NY 10112-0228UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machine power tools, namely router cutters and guide wheels and bearings being parts of router cutters | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 28, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 2, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 7, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 2, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 2, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 27, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 1, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 2, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 8, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 19, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 3, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |